From Linear to Programmatic: How Deal IDs Made TV Buying Behave Like Digital

Addressable TV grew faster once buyers could purchase it the same way they buy digital video: inside a DSP, with clear targeting, pacing, reporting, and optimization. The turning point was not a single technology – it was the operational standardization of programmatic pipes: PMPs and Deal IDs.

What a Deal ID really is

A Deal ID is basically a “private contract address” in programmatic advertising.

  • Seller (publisher or SSP) curate a package of inventory:
    • device type (CTV)
    • content category (sports, drama, anime)
    • negotiated price(CPM)
    • ad rules (frequency caps, geo / time-targeting)
    • audience segment (optional)
  • Buyer activates it in a DSP:
    • The Trade Desk, DV360, etc.
    • It behaves like a switch: ON/OFF + budget controls

So instead of emailing spreadsheets and manually trafficking, buyers can manage campaigns like digital.

Why Deal IDs accelerate addressable

Because they solve 4 pain points:

  1. Speed: campaigns launch faster
  2. Control: buyers manage pacing and flighting
  3. Transparency: clearer price (CPM) and reporting
  4. Scale: one buyer can activate across many publishers using familiar workflows

This is why addressable TV grew from “experimental projects” into “always-on budgets”.

The CPM logic: why buyers accept premium prices

In linear TV, a buyer often pays for broad reach and hopes the audience matches.

In addressable:

  • CPM can be higher,
  • but waste is lower,
  • and outcomes tend to be clearer.

A simplified example:

  • Linear TV: 1,000,000 impressions at 80 THB CPM
    • maybe only 25% are in-target
    • effective CPM to target can be much worse
  • Addressable: 300,000 impressions at 180 THB CPM
    • but 80–90% in-target
    • outcomes (conversions, completion-rate) improve

Agencies don’t buy CPM alone. They buy efficient outcomes.

Where GAM fits (GAM360)

In GAM, programmatic inventory is typically represented as:

  • Ad units (where the ads show)
  • Key-values (metadata, like content type or device type)
  • Yield groups / competition rules (who competes)
  • Line items (deals, sponsorships, open auction)
  • Publisher provided signal / PPS (detailed contextual signals)

For a publisher, the aim is to make “CTV inventory” legible to buyers:

  • CTV_LIVE_PREMIUM
  • CTV_VOD_HIGH_COMPLETION
  • SPORTS_LIVE…and then attach appropriate demand pipes.

SSP vs DSP vs GAM

  • DSP: where buyers run campaigns and spend budgets
  • SSP: where supply is packaged and offered programmatically
  • GAM: the ad server deciding what wins each impression

Addressable TV growth accelerates when those three connect smoothly.

A practical “starter kit” (3 Deal IDs you can sell today)

If you are building traction:

  1. CTV Premium Run-of-Network (RON) Deal
    • broad reach
    • stable delivery
    • average CPM, high scale
  2. Live Event / Sports Deal
    • scarcity + premium
    • great sponsorship add-ons
  3. High Completion VOD Deal
    • performance-driven
    • easier to justify for outcomes KPIs

Then add one addressable layer:

  • Geo (province/city)
  • Device type (CTV only)
  • Audience segment (broad: “mid to high income earners” or “parent with kids”)